PlusPedia wird derzeit technisch modernisiert. Aktuell laufen Wartungsarbeiten. Für etwaige Unannehmlichkeiten bitten wir um Entschuldigung; es sind aber alle Artikel zugänglich und Sie können PlusPedia genauso nutzen wie immer.

Neue User bitte dringend diese Hinweise lesen:

Anmeldung - E-Mail-Adresse Neue Benutzer benötigen ab sofort eine gültige Email-Adresse. Wenn keine Email ankommt, meldet Euch bitte unter NewU25@PlusPedia.de.

Hinweis zur Passwortsicherheit:
Bitte nutzen Sie Ihr PlusPedia-Passwort nur bei PlusPedia.
Wenn Sie Ihr PlusPedia-Passwort andernorts nutzen, ändern Sie es bitte DORT bis unsere Modernisierung abgeschlossen ist.
Überall wo es sensibel, sollte man generell immer unterschiedliche Passworte verwenden! Das gilt hier und im gesamten Internet.
Aus Gründen der Sicherheit (PlusPedia hatte bis 24.07.2025 kein SSL | https://)

Bei PlusPedia sind Sie sicher: – Wir verarbeiten keine personenbezogenen Daten, erlauben umfassend anonyme Mitarbeit und erfüllen die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DSGVO) vollumfänglich. Es haftet der Vorsitzende des Trägervereins.

PlusPedia blüht wieder auf als freundliches deutsches Lexikon.
Wir haben auf die neue Version 1.43.3 aktualisiert.
Wir haben SSL aktiviert.
Hier geht es zu den aktuellen Aktuelle Ereignissen

Benutzer:Mutter Erde/Twilight Zone Saint Petersburg, Florida, Vol. 1

Aus PlusPedia
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen

User talk:78.55.56.149

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been declined.

Vandalism

  • Decline reason:

I'm having a bit of trouble identifying you; I gather that you are a banned user trying to avoid a block, but what was your original username? It's hard to review your request without more information. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism is a crude lie. I will inform Jimbo after being unblocked, so that he can sent NuclearWarfare into the desert. And if not, that's not my problem. But Jimbo should get informed about this faker. 78.55.56.149 (talk) 16:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

But- and I just want to check this here- you clearly are the banned user who made the block necessary, and not an uninvolved person caught in the rangeblock. If I cared, I suppose I could ask User:NuclearWarfare who you are, but I don't care that much, so if you don't want to answer, it's fine. Don't worry- it doesn't appear that anyone else is being currently harmed by this block, but it's sweet of you to be concerned. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Go, tell that Jimbo, or unblock me, so I can ask him by myself about this so-called vandalism. Shame on NuclearWarfare and his supporters. Regards 78.55.56.149 (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
No, there's nothing here that makes me think I need to either contact Jimbo, contact NuclearWarfare, or unblock. If there's more evidence that would show me why that would be likely to make the encyclopedia better, feel free to put it here, but for now, I think only that you must have been very naughty to make such a rangeblock necessary, and whoever you are and whatever you've been doing, the best solution is probably for you to stop. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
A lie is a lie. Doesn't matter, how important the lier is. The wikipedia-software forgets nothing, not in 100 years. Think about it. Ciao 78.55.56.149 (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
What, specifically, is the lie? You say that it is a lie that you have vandalized, but since I don't know what accounts you have been using, I have no way to verify that as a lie. If I don't care enough to try to find out about it today, I doubt anyone will be searching it out in a hundred years. NuclearWarfare isn't particularly important, in any case. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey, you are the admin. So it should be simple for you to check out, which Hansenet-IP was the reason, to consider its contributions as vandalism. It's the 78... range, sometimes additionally the 92... range. I give you one Dollar, in case you will find one single vandalism out of hundreds of edits. But please show me this edit. So, this story is also important for Jimbo, because it might be important for some donators in future. 78.55.56.149 (talk) 17:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Nah, I don't know how to do that. Why don't you give me links to your five most useful edits, instead? -17:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Well, see these both http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/78.55.99.36 or this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/78.55.203.253. Don't forget commons and the interwikis. 78.55.56.149 (talk) 17:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, that was helpful. I have a much better picture of your edits now; I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish, but it doesn't seem to have anything to do with making the encyclopedia better, so I guess I'll just ignore you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
I would say, you should look again, a bit more careful. btw: On User:Lar's disc are more Hansenet contribs, but they are more important on commons and the interwikis. You can still earn a Dollar! Or in one phrase: Vandalism by me is a classic fake 78.55.56.149 (talk) 17:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

User talk:78.55.203.253

Fehler beim Erstellen des Vorschaubildes: Datei fehlt Attention:
This IP address, 78.55.203.253, is registered to ALICE DSL, Germany. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact ALICE DSL, Germany to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, ALICE DSL, Germany, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the Wikipedia:Special:Contributions/78.55.203.253 history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

December 2009

Fehler beim Erstellen des Vorschaubildes: Datei fehlt Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you! Momo san Gespräch 16:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared Wikipedia:IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Fehler beim Erstellen des Vorschaubildes: Datei fehlt Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:User talk:Darrenhusted, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Momo san Gespräch 16:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared Wikipedia:IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I'm not interested to talk with you on an IP talk page. I will forward this to Jimbo's talk page. Or you revert yourself two times 78.55.203.253 (talk) 16:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Fehler beim Erstellen des Vorschaubildes: Datei fehlt
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 16:32, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not the vandal, the vandals are others. Follow my edits 78.55.203.253 (talk)"

Decline reason: "I have reviewed a large amount of the edits made by you and by the several editors with whom you are in conflict. There is no doubt at all that the vandal is you. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 16:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)"

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read our guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. Note that misuse of the unblock request procedure may result in the removal of your talk page editing privileges for the duration of your block.

.

This blocked user is asking that his or her block be reviewed:

Then look again at the edits of Wikipedia:User:Darrenhusted and Wikipedia:User:Momusufan. These are vandals, nobody else (+ Wikipedia:User:Kanonkas of course, but he is currently offline, so he cannot vandalize at moment 78.55.203.253 (talk) 16:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Note:

  • In some cases, a user may not in fact be blocked, or their block may be expired. Please check your block log. If no blocks are listed, or the latest one has already expired, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only: If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request (please use {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification|1=ExpandTemplates}} for notifying), replace this template with the following as notification.

{{Unblock on hold|1=blocking administrator|2=Then look again at the edits of [[Wikipedia:User:Darrenhusted]] and [[Wikipedia:User:Momusufan]]. These are vandals, nobody else (+ [[Wikipedia:User:Kanonkas]] of course, but he is currently offline, so he cannot vandalize at moment [[Special:Contributions/78.55.203.253|78.55.203.253]] ([[User talk:78.55.203.253#top|talk]]) 16:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)|3=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following as notification, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=Then look again at the edits of [[Wikipedia:User:Darrenhusted]] and [[Wikipedia:User:Momusufan]]. These are vandals, nobody else (+ [[Wikipedia:User:Kanonkas]] of course, but he is currently offline, so he cannot vandalize at moment [[Wikipedia:Special:Contributions/78.55.203.253|78.55.203.253]] ([[Wikipedia:User talk:78.55.203.253#top|talk]]) 16:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the request, replace the unblock template with {{tlx|1=unblock|2=reason}}, and post the following directly underneath the unblock template:
{{subst:Request accepted|1=reason}}
Editor re-blocked with talk-page access revoked; there is no point in entertaining this editor. Tan | 39 16:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Best of User:Kanonkas collection Nov/Dec 2009, given to Jimbo Wales

Best of User:Kanonkas, Nov/Dec 2009 (only en)!

First vandalized, then locked

Vandalized by Darrenhusted (seems to be a buddy of Kanonkas), locked by Ged UK (also a buddy? Never heard of him?)

commons:File:George_Sanders-Debra_Paget-Movie_Still.jpg

Please undelete this file, I couldn't find a copyright renewal for this at the US copyright office.

Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&diff=32732013&oldid=32729707

Saturday incident

see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kanonkas&oldid=329890372#78.55.xxx.xxx That's interesting: Two guys were vandalizing, but getting blocked was the IP, which was a witness. Strange, or? Bonustrack . Regards 78.50.130.70 (talk) 00:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


FYI

  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:78.55.17.150 Regards 78.55.17.150 (talk) 13:41, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
  2. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Forum&diff=32675986&oldid=32674895 Regards 78.55.116.105 (talk) 19:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
I doubt he is really that interested in a squabble you're having on Commons. Don't cross wikis with your drama. Killiondude (talk) 19:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Are you his speaker :-). Commons is responsible for 650 projects including en. So Mr. Wales should place only the best admins there. In fact, German wikipedia has sent some candidates, who have no chance to become an admin there, to commons (as de:Benutzer:ABF (15 years old). I guess other wikipedias do that similiar to the Germans (as 5-weeks-User:Kanonkas).
I wonder that some Germans have not sent de:Benutzer:Seewolf, see [1] and Please block and ban LKD in your archive. 78.55.251.148 (talk) 12:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • We get it. You don't like Kanonkas
Who is "we"? Jimbo ? 78.55.251.148 (talk) 12:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Clarification

Hi Jimbo , what does that mean in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=next&oldid=327277938 ? That you don't want to to get confidental informations via email from Kanonkas? or from Mutter Erde? - or that there is no privavy on commons? Regards Mutter Erde 78.55.251.169 (talk) 23:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Secrecy of the mails

Hi Jimbo, is it true, that there is no secrecy of mails (and e-mails) on commons? I presume that on commons rules the same law as in Florida, right? On the other hand, User:Kanonkas offers confidental stuff about commons:User:Mutter Erde via e-mail. Are these infos really private or is someone allowed to publish them? (I mean Kanonkas' mails, my mail was published long ago). See here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Forum&diff=32168214&oldid=32136043 (Kanonkas does'nt like that others might publish his e-mails, I guess :-) You will get a copy of this contibution per email of course. Regards Mutter Erde 78.55.148.228 (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


78.55.xxx.xxx

...is still trolling Jimbo's page. I don't know if a range block would be appropriate, maybe not by you (as this may be seen as adding to the dramah) but by another admin, I'm not familiar with range block requests, otherwise I'd put a request in somewhere on your behalf. Darrenhusted (talk) 14:13, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

E-mail, on. Darrenhusted (talk) 17:35, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
comment due to Kanonkas' request on your talk page
I guess Kanonkas has told you to give steward Mardentanha a note, so that he can stay in the background. Mardentanha helps sometimes Kanonkas with a global block of my IPs. Read this, before you contact him. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/elections_2009/statements/Mardetanha#No Do you really want a contact with Ahmadinezhad's guys? Don't be a dick Regards 78.55.65.135 (talk) 20:00, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Interwiki poll by chance

  • Is this vandalism or not? Regards Mutter Erde 92.230.92.67 (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Underaged Admins. Small Talk with Jimbo

Abgerufen von „https://h.suprapedia.de/w/index.php?title=Benutzer:Mutter_Erde/Twilight_Zone_Saint_Petersburg,_Florida,_Vol._1&oldid=304162“